MENU

Wearable Biosensors Explained

← Back to Biosensors & POCT guides

TECHNOLOGY EXPLAINER

Wearable Biosensors
— Materials and signal quality for measuring on the skin, while moving

Optical sensing on a watch (PPG), electrical sensing with patches on the chest or forearm (ECG), electrochemical sensing of sweat: in wearable biosensors, a different principle means different disturbances to the signal and different materials challenges. What they share is the difficulty of getting a stable signal for hours from soft, moving skin. From a materials engineer's viewpoint, this article sets out the principle and error sources of each approach, the materials for flexible substrates, stretchable interconnects and encapsulation, wear and signal quality, and what can be confirmed as in practical use from regulatory documents versus what is still research.

Built from peer-reviewed papers (Science, Nature, Physiological Measurement and others), official FDA documents, the U.S. Code of Federal Regulations and the official pages of standards bodies / Last updated October 2026

Hero image: a lab bench with wearable sensor prototypes (watch-type, chest patch, forearm patch, stretchable-wiring sample)
Conceptual image (AI-generated). A watch-type device, a thin electrode patch for the chest, a transparent sweat patch for the forearm and a wiring sample on a stretchable silicone sheet, laid out on a lab bench. It does not represent real products or structures.
What this article covers
  1. What wearable biosensors are (the short version)
  2. A map of three sensing approaches: light, electricity, chemistry
  3. Optical sensing (PPG): principle and what disturbs the signal
  4. Electrical sensing (ECG): between electrode and skin
  5. Our calculation: how much electrode contact impedance reduces an ECG signal
  6. A materials engineer's view (1): flexible substrates, stretchable interconnects, encapsulation
  7. Where sweat sensors fit
  8. A materials engineer's view (2): wear and signal quality are matters of materials and geometry
  9. What is in practical use (as far as official documents confirm) and what is research
  10. What is still hard, and what could not be confirmed
  11. Glossary / References / Claim-to-source audit
Labels used in this article, and a note

Sourced = stated in a published source (link given)
Our calculation = a value this article calculated from stated assumptions
Not yet confirmed = a plan, a target, or something for which no result could be confirmed
Interpretation of material design is marked "Commentary" and kept separate.
This article explains materials, principles, signal quality and regulation. It is not advice on diagnosis, treatment or medication, or on how to take a measured value or notification, and it does not rank any product or company.

1. What wearable biosensors are (the short version)

  • What they measure: signals that can be taken from outside the body: changes in blood volume (light), the heart's electrical activity (electricity), constituents of sweat (chemistry) and so on.
  • What is hard: a review says that to obtain more than heart rate from a wearable, one must account for noise sources from individual variation (skin tone, obesity, age, gender), physiology (respiration, venous pulsation, body site, body temperature) and external perturbations of the device (motion artifact, ambient light, applied pressure on the skin) Sourced [Reference 2].
  • Practical use: the FDA classified an ECG app and a PPG-based irregular-rhythm notification feature by De Novo in 2018 Sourced (Section 9). On the other hand, the FDA in 2025 warned about unauthorized software features on smartwatches and similar devices that claim to measure blood pressure Sourced.
The one line that matters most

A sensor being "small and thin" does not mean "the signal is stable on the skin". Signal quality is set by principle, materials, geometry and contact with the skin together (Commentary).

2. A map of three sensing approaches: light, electricity, chemistry

Three sensing approaches in wearable biosensors (concept) For each: what is measured, what it is made of, and what disturbs the signal (summary of papers). Optical (PPG) Electrical (ECG) Chemical (sweat) Measures Changes in tissue blood volume (light absorption) Main parts LED, photodetector, light-transmitting window What disturbs the signal Motion, ambient light, pressure, skin tone, body site, temperature [References 1 and 2] Measures Electrical activity of the heart (tiny potentials on the skin) Main parts Ag/AgCl (gel) electrodes, dry electrodes, conductive fabric What disturbs the signal Electrode–skin contact, skin preparation, long-term irritation [References 4 and 5] Measures Constituents of sweat (lactate, electrolytes, etc.) Main parts Enzyme electrodes, ion-selective membranes, microchannels, temp. sensor What disturbs the signal Sweat rate (dilution), skin contamination, pH, temperature [References 10 and 11] * Principles and error sources follow Allen [Reference 1], Fine et al. [Reference 2], Meziane et al. [Reference 4], Gao et al. [Reference 10] and Parlak et al. [Reference 11]. The grouping into three and the parts are this article's own.
Fig. 1 Conceptual diagram (vector drawing). The principles and error sources of the three approaches [References 1, 2, 4, 10 and 11]. The grouping into three is this article's own and does not show the construction of any real product.

3. Optical sensing (PPG): principle and what disturbs the signal

Photoplethysmography (PPG) is a simple, low-cost optical technique that detects blood volume changes in the microvascular bed of tissue. The PPG waveform comprises a pulsatile ('AC') component synchronous with the heartbeat, superimposed on a slowly varying baseline ('DC') with lower-frequency components attributed to respiration, sympathetic nervous system activity and thermoregulation Sourced [Reference 1].

Conceptual illustration of wearable biosensors
Fig. 2 Conceptual image (AI-generated).In reflective PPG, light from an emitter scatters through skin and a photodiode detects the returning light, which varies with blood volume. Skin contact and ambient light also affect the signal. AI-generated concept, not a product structure, scale drawing or micrograph.
View the original SVG schematic, source notes and numerical details
Principle of reflective PPG and what disturbs the signal (concept) LED light is absorbed and scattered in the skin; the detector receives what returns. Pulsing blood volume changes it. Substrate (with window) LED Detector Epidermis (contains melanin) Dermis (microvascular bed: blood volume pulses) Subcutaneous tissue Noise sources (from a review) - Individual: skin tone, obesity, age, gender - Physiology: respiration, venous pulsation, body site, temperature - External: motion, ambient light, pressure on the skin - The device's own hardware and software [Reference 2] * The PPG principle (AC and DC components) follows Allen [Reference 1]; noise sources follow Fine et al. [Reference 2]. * Layer thicknesses, light paths and element positions are schematic, not a real device's structure.
Fig. 2 Conceptual diagram (vector drawing). The principle of reflective PPG [Reference 1] and its noise sources [Reference 2]. Layer thicknesses and light paths are schematic and do not show a real device or real skin structure.

Wavelength and skin tone: an optical-materials issue

Fine and colleagues' review relates skin tone to melanin content and notes that melanin absorption falls gradually from the ultraviolet through the visible range, which affects how light travels through skin [Reference 2]. Two reported examples are cited Sourced.

  • A dorsal-wrist heart-rate monitor with a single 535 nm (green) LED, validated in 256 subjects (54 "fair", 181 "moderate", 21 "dark" skin), showed a tendency for heart-rate error to increase with darker skin tone
  • A multi-wavelength PPG device with a 590 nm (yellow-orange) LED (20 subjects, Fitzpatrick II to IV) showed that for Fitzpatrick IV the perfusion index (AC/DC) rose by a factor of 1.2 to 7.1

Both are individual studies cited by the review, with limited devices, subjects and conditions. What follows is that source wavelength, window transmission and detector layout are design variables that shape differences by skin tone (Commentary).

A report from medical pulse oximetry

Sjoding and colleagues analyzed pairs of arterial blood gas and pulse oximetry measurements in hospital patients. Among measurements in which pulse oximetry read 92 to 96%, arterial oxygen saturation was below 88% (occult hypoxemia) in 11.7% (88/749) of Black patients and 3.6% (99/2778) of White patients in the University of Michigan cohort, and in 17.0% (160/939) and 6.2% (546/8795) in the multicenter cohort Sourced [Reference 3]. The authors state that Black patients had nearly three times the frequency of occult hypoxemia not detected by pulse oximetry. This is a study of hospital pulse oximeters and does not directly show the performance of wearable devices. It is, however, an important report that differences by skin tone can be a real issue in optical measurement.

4. Electrical sensing (ECG): between electrode and skin

An electrocardiogram (ECG) picks up, with two or more electrodes, the tiny potentials on the skin surface produced by the heart's electrical activity. The challenge for wearables is contact between electrode and skin.

  • Gel-type Ag/AgCl electrodes: the review by Meziane and colleagues says that conventional disposable Ag/AgCl electrodes give excellent signal quality but are irritating for long-term use, and that skin preparation such as shaving and cleansing with alcohol is usually required Sourced [Reference 4].
  • Dry electrodes: according to the same review, dry electrodes that work without gel, adhesive or skin preparation have been studied for decades but, while used in research, have yet to achieve acceptance for medical use (as of 2013) [Reference 4].
  • Thin electronics laminated on skin: Kim and colleagues reported electronic systems with thickness, effective elastic modulus, bending stiffness and areal mass density matched to the epidermis. Laminated on skin, they achieve conformal contact and adhesion based on van der Waals interactions alone, and were used to measure electrical activity of the heart, brain and skeletal muscles Sourced [Reference 5].

Among standards, the basic safety and essential performance requirements for ambulatory electrocardiographic systems are set out in IEC 60601-2-47:2012 (Medical electrical equipment – Part 2-47: Particular requirements for the basic safety and essential performance of ambulatory electrocardiographic systems) Sourced [Reference 19] (the text is paid, so only the title and scope are confirmed here).

5. Our calculation: how much electrode contact impedance reduces an ECG signal

Our calculation

Treat the electrode–skin contact impedance Ze and the amplifier input impedance Zin as forming a voltage divider Our calculation. The fraction of the signal reaching the amplifier is Zin ÷ (Zin + Ze).

  • Assumptions: Zin = 10 MΩ (a value assumed here); Ze = 10 kΩ, 100 kΩ, 1 MΩ and 5 MΩ (illustrative values)
  • Results: 10 kΩ → 99.9%, 100 kΩ → 99.0%, 1 MΩ → 90.9%, 5 MΩ → 66.7%
  • Difference between the two electrodes: if the two electrodes' Ze differ by ΔZ, part of a common-mode disturbance (such as mains pickup) reaching both is converted to a differential signal, roughly ΔZ ÷ Zin. For ΔZ = 100 kΩ that is 1%; for a common-mode disturbance of 1 V (assumed), a spurious differential signal of about 10 mV
  • Comparison: if an ECG signal is assumed to be of the order of 1 mV, this spurious signal is larger

Assumptions and limits: Zin, Ze, the size of the common-mode disturbance and the ECG amplitude are all illustrative values assumed here, not values of any real device or person. Real amplifiers include circuits that suppress common-mode disturbance (CMRR, right-leg drive and so on). All the calculation shows is the structure: both the size of the contact impedance and the difference between the two sides bear on signal quality (Commentary).

Contact impedance and the fraction of signal reaching the amplifier (our calculation) Amplifier input impedance assumed to be 10 MΩ. Fraction = Zin / (Zin + Ze). Ze = 10 kΩ Ze = 100 kΩ Ze = 1 MΩ Ze = 5 MΩ 99.9% 99.0% 90.9% 66.7% 0% 50% 100% * The amplifier input impedance (10 MΩ) and contact impedances (10 kΩ to 5 MΩ) are illustrative values assumed here. * Common-mode conversion from a difference ΔZ between electrodes is ΔZ/Zin (100 kΩ/10 MΩ = 1%). Real amplifiers suppress it. * The figure shows structure, not the performance of any real electrode or device.
Fig. 3 Diagram including our calculation (vector drawing). The signal fraction from a voltage divider, calculated with illustrative impedances. All numbers are illustrations based on our assumptions and do not show the performance of real devices or electrodes.

6. A materials engineer's view (1): flexible substrates, stretchable interconnects, encapsulation

The wearable challenge is how to connect hard electronic parts to stretching skin. The materials strategies that can be confirmed in papers are organized layer by layer.

Layer / elementMaterials and design confirmed in papersPoints for materials engineers (Commentary)
Substrate100-µm moisture-resistant PET (sweat sensor) [Reference 10]. A flexible SEBS elastomer (sweat cortisol sensor) [Reference 11]. Circuits built on 1-µm polymer foil with an areal mass of 3 g/m² [Reference 9]. Ultrathin systems matched to the modulus and bending stiffness of the epidermis [Reference 5]The substrate's thickness and modulus decide how well it adheres to skin and follows movement. Fundamentals of polyesters, elastomers and polyimides are in the polymers explainers of this series
InterconnectRigid functional elements embedded in an ultralow-modulus soft medium, surviving strain through controlled mechanical buckling and similar means [Reference 7]. A strategy of combining microstructured inorganic and organic materials with elastomeric substrates [Reference 6]. A printable elastic conductor in which silver nanoparticles form in situ from silver flakes, fluorine rubber and surfactant: above 4,000 S/cm at 0% strain and 935 S/cm when stretched up to 400% (highest value 6,168 S/cm) [Reference 8]The challenge is keeping conductivity and stretchability together. Metal lines let strain escape through their shape (wavy, serpentine); conductive fillers keep stretchability through how particles are arranged (this article's summary). Filler–resin relations are in the explainer on polymer blends and fillers
Electrode and skinGel-type Ag/AgCl gives excellent signals but irritates in long-term use; dry electrodes were not accepted for medical use as of 2013 [Reference 4]. Thin devices matched to the epidermis adhere through van der Waals interactions [Reference 5]Quality of contact is a matter of adhesive, gel and shape. Skin adhesion is in the explainer on patch sensors and skin adhesion; adhesives in the explainers on adhesives and tapes
Insulation and protection500-nm parylene C insulation (sweat sensor) [Reference 10]. A polyethylene-based hydrophobic protection layer (sweat cortisol sensor) [Reference 11]Both encapsulation against sweat, moisture and washing and an opening that lets sweat in are needed. Barrier properties are in the explainer on barrier properties and coatings; silicones in the explainer on silicones
Safety of skin-contact materialsThe framework for biological evaluation of medical devices is ISO 10993-1:2025; skin sensitization tests are ISO 10993-10:2021 and irritation tests ISO 10993-23:2021 [References 20 to 22]For a material worn on skin for long periods, the adhesive, substrate and electrode materials can all be subject to evaluation (Commentary). How it applies depends on the product and use

All Sourced (papers and the official pages of standards bodies). The right column is this article's Commentary. For the standards, only titles and editions were confirmed; the texts were not.

Connecting hard parts to skin through a soft medium (concept) Left = plan view (rigid islands and stretchable lines) / right = cross-section of the layers Rigid islands (chips, sensors) and stretchable lines Wavy lines let the skin's stretch escape (schematic) Encapsulation / protection (against sweat, moisture) Soft medium (elastomer) Interconnect layer (rigid parts as islands) Substrate (PET, elastomer, etc.) Adhesive / gel → skin Layer order and thickness are schematic * Rigid elements in a soft medium: Xu et al. [Reference 7]; stretchable-electronics strategies: Rogers et al. [Reference 6]. * Substrate, insulation and protection layers of sweat sensors follow Gao et al. [Reference 10] and Parlak et al. [Reference 11]. * Shapes, layer order and thickness are this article's concept, not the structure of any real product or paper's device.
Fig. 4 Conceptual diagram (vector drawing). The idea of connecting hard parts to skin through a soft medium [References 6, 7, 10 and 11]. Shapes, layer order and thickness are this article's concept and do not show the structure of any real product.
Fig. 5: wavy wiring on a stretchable silicone sheet being pulled by fingers (with magnified windows)
Fig. 5 Conceptual image (AI-generated). Fingers stretching wavy metal wiring on a transparent stretchable sheet, with magnified windows showing the wiring changing shape as it stretches. It does not show a real device, dimensions or materials.

7. Where sweat sensors fit

For electrochemical wearables that measure sweat lactate, electrolytes and the like, Gao and colleagues reported an example integrating a sensor array on a PET substrate with skin-temperature compensation Sourced [Reference 10]. Parlak and colleagues reported a cortisol sensor with a built-in MIP together with microcapillary uptake of sweat [Reference 11]. How each fluid relates to blood, the conditions of collection, dilution, pH and temperature, the stack of an electrochemical sweat sensor and the status of practical use are covered in detail in the explainer on biomarkers in body fluids in this series, so they are not repeated here. This article also could not confirm regulatory authorization of a wearable sensor measuring glucose or lactate in sweat.

8. A materials engineer's view (2): wear and signal quality are matters of materials and geometry

A materials engineer's view: the signal comes not from "the sensor" but from "the sensor-and-skin system"

For each approach, the factors that move signal quality tie back to materials and geometry (the factors come from papers; the ties are this article's Commentary).

  • PPG (light): applied pressure and motion [Reference 2] are set by band material, tightness and case shape. Ambient light is a matter of light-shielding structure, and skin tone of wavelength and the optical properties of the window
  • ECG (electrical): electrode–skin contact [Reference 4] is a matter of electrode material, gel or adhesive, skin preparation and how well the substrate conforms. As the calculation in Section 5 shows, the size of the contact impedance and the difference between the two sides bear directly on signal quality
  • Sweat (chemical): skin-surface contamination and temperature [Reference 10] are matters of channel design, temperature compensation, and cleaning and adhesion
  • Long wear: gel-type electrodes irritate in long-term use [Reference 4]. Biological evaluation of the materials on skin (adhesive, substrate, electrode) under the ISO 10993 series constrains material selection [References 20 to 22]

It is the same pattern as "the interface decides performance" in adhesion and encapsulation. The knowledge in the explainers on adhesives, tapes, silicones and barrier properties and coatings applies directly here.

9. What is in practical use (as far as official documents confirm) and what is research

Approach / functionWhat regulatory documents and standards confirmClass and source
ECG (OTC software)ECG App: De Novo DEN180044, classification order dated 11 September 2018. A software-only mobile medical application for use with the Apple Watch that "create[s], record[s], store[s], transfer[s], and display[s] a single channel electrocardiogram (ECG) similar to a Lead I ECG" and determines the presence of atrial fibrillation (AFib) or sinus rhythm. Over the counter (OTC). The data are for informational use only, and "the user is not intended to interpret or take clinical action based on the device output without consultation of a qualified healthcare professional". Not for people under 22; not recommended for users with other known arrhythmias. Classification: 21 CFR 870.2345 (electrocardiograph software for over-the-counter use, Class II)FDA classification order [Reference 12], U.S. Code of Federal Regulations [Reference 15]. De Novo classifies a new type of device
Irregular-rhythm notification from PPG (OTC)Irregular Rhythm Notification Feature: De Novo DEN180042, dated 11 September 2018. Analyzes pulse rate data to identify episodes of irregular heart rhythms suggestive of AFib and provides a notification. It is "not intended to provide a notification on every episode" and "the absence of a notification is not intended to indicate no disease process is present". Data are captured only when the user is still. Not for people under 22 or previously diagnosed with AFib. Classification: 21 CFR 870.2790 (photoplethysmograph analysis software for over-the-counter use, Class II). A Fitbit Loss of Pulse Detection (510(k) K242967, 25 February 2025) is recorded in the same categoryFDA classification order [Reference 13], U.S. Code of Federal Regulations [Reference 16], FDA 510(k) [Reference 23]
Pulse oximeters21 CFR 870.2700: an oximeter transmits radiation of known wavelength(s) through blood and measures oxygen saturation from the reflected or scattered radiation; Class II. The standard is ISO 80601-2-61:2026 (basic safety and essential performance of pulse oximeter equipment, third edition). A product code for over-the-counter pulse oximeters (OLK) existsU.S. Code of Federal Regulations [Reference 17], ISO [Reference 18]. The product code is this article's own check (openFDA)
Standard for ambulatory ECG systemsIEC 60601-2-47:2012 (basic safety and essential performance of ambulatory electrocardiographic systems, second edition)IEC [Reference 19]
Blood pressure (software features on wearables)In a safety communication of 16 September 2025 the FDA said that many over-the-counter blood pressure devices lack FDA marketing authorization and, for unauthorized software features on smartwatches and smart rings that claim to measure or estimate blood pressure, safety and effectiveness have not been evaluated. Authorized devices will generally have the product code DXN. The FDA says it is taking steps against unauthorized blood pressure devices, including software features on wearablesFDA safety communication [Reference 14]
Wearable sweat sensorsAuthorization could not be confirmed (see the result in the explainer on biomarkers in body fluids in this series). Research reports: Gao et al., Parlak et al.[References 10 and 11]

Clearance or approval is a judgment for a specific intended use and does not mean "safe and accurate however it is used". FDA 510(k) clearance, De Novo authorization and PMA approval are different systems. Product names are given as they appear in FDA documents, as fact, not as a ranking.

Stage confirmed in regulatory documents, by wearable function (this article's summary) Green: class confirmed / orange: research only / red frame: warning on unauthorized ones / dashed: not confirmed Function Status in regulatory documents Note ECG (OTC) PPG irregular rhythm Pulse oximetry Blood pressure (est.) Sweat constituents De Novo 2018 / 21 CFR 870.2345 (software, Class II) De Novo 2018 / 21 CFR 870.2790 (software, Class II) 21 CFR 870.2700 (Class II) ISO 80601-2-61:2026 FDA safety communication of September 2025 on unauthorized ones Authorization of a wearable sensor not confirmed Informational; not a substitute for diagnosis (indications) No notification does not mean no disease (indications) Skin-tone differences reported (hospital study) Authorized devices generally have product code DXN Research stage (Gao et al., Parlak et al.) * Sources are the table in Section 9 and References 12 to 23. The order is this article's own, not "more advanced first". * "Not confirmed" is a result within the scope of this article's search and is not proof that none exists.
Fig. 6 Conceptual diagram (vector drawing). For each function, the stage confirmed in regulatory documents [References 10 to 23]. The order is this article's own and does not show superiority in performance or degree of advancement.

10. What is still hard, and what could not be confirmed

(1) Differences by skin tone

Differences by skin tone have been reported for hospital pulse oximetry [Reference 3], and the PPG review also lists skin tone as a noise source [Reference 2]. This article could not confirm a primary source that systematically compared the performance of wearable devices across skin tones. Not yet confirmed

(2) Long wear and effects on skin

Gel-type electrodes are said to irritate in long-term use [Reference 4], and dry electrodes had not been accepted for medical use as of 2013. This article has not confirmed the latest primary sources on the situation since then.

(3) Long-term reliability of stretchable interconnects

Values for the conductivity and stretchability of elastic conductors have been reported [Reference 8], but this article could not confirm a primary source that quantified degradation under repeated stretching, washing and long exposure to sweat in real use. Not yet confirmed

(4) How to take values and notifications

This article does not cover how to take measured values or notifications, or reference ranges. The FDA indications also state that the output is informational and that medical judgment presupposes consulting a healthcare professional [References 12 and 13].

Summary
  • A different approach means different noise sources and materials challenges. Light: motion, pressure, skin tone; electricity: electrode–skin contact; chemistry: dilution, contamination, temperature Sourced
  • Contact impedance bears on both the signal fraction and the difference between sides. In the illustration, at 5 MΩ the signal falls to 66.7% Our calculation
  • The materials strategy is a thin soft substrate, stretchable interconnects and encapsulation together. An elastic conductor is reported at 935 S/cm at 400% stretch Sourced
  • What regulatory documents confirm includes OTC ECG software and PPG irregular-rhythm notification (De Novo, 2018) and the pulse-oximeter category Sourced
  • In 2025 the FDA warned about unauthorized blood pressure features and the like Sourced
  • Authorization of wearable sweat sensors could not be confirmed Sourced

11. Glossary

PPG (photoplethysmography)
Detecting changes in tissue blood volume with light. Used to detect heartbeat and pulse.
AC / DC component
The heartbeat-synchronous pulsatile part (AC) and the slowly varying baseline (DC) of a PPG waveform.
Perfusion index
The ratio of the AC to the DC component of PPG; a guide to signal strength.
Fitzpatrick scale
A scale of 1 to 6 for skin colour, originally devised to express sensitivity to ultraviolet light.
ECG (electrocardiogram)
A recording of the potentials on the skin surface produced by the heart's electrical activity.
Ag/AgCl electrode
A silver/silver-chloride electrode, standard for biopotential measurement, used with a gel.
Dry electrode
An electrode that touches the skin directly, without gel or adhesive.
Contact impedance
A measure of the electrical resistance at the electrode–skin contact; bears directly on signal quality.
Common-mode disturbance
Noise that enters both electrodes in the same way, such as pickup from mains power.
Elastomer
A rubber-like polymer that stretches and recovers; used for substrates and encapsulation.
Elastic conductor
A material that stays conductive when stretched; some are made by dispersing conductive filler in an elastomer.
Parylene C
A thin polymer insulating film deposited from the gas phase.
De Novo
The FDA pathway that newly classifies a new type of lower-risk device into Class I or II.
OTC
Over the counter: available and usable without a prescription.
ISO 10993
A family of standards for biological evaluation of medical devices; relevant to materials that touch the skin.

12. References

  1. Allen J. "Photoplethysmography and its application in clinical physiological measurement", Physiol Meas 2007;28:R1-R39 — doi.org
  2. Fine J et al. "Sources of inaccuracy in photoplethysmography for continuous cardiovascular monitoring", Biosensors 2021;11:126 — doi.org
  3. Sjoding MW et al. "Racial bias in pulse oximetry measurement", N Engl J Med 2020;383:2477-2478 — doi.org
  4. Meziane N et al. "Dry electrodes for electrocardiography", Physiol Meas 2013;34:R47-R69 — doi.org
  5. Kim DH et al. "Epidermal electronics", Science 2011;333:838-843 — doi.org
  6. Rogers JA et al. "Materials and mechanics for stretchable electronics", Science 2010;327:1603-1607 — doi.org
  7. Xu S et al. "Soft microfluidic assemblies of sensors, circuits, and radios for the skin", Science 2014;344:70-74 — doi.org
  8. Matsuhisa N et al. "Printable elastic conductors by in situ formation of silver nanoparticles from silver flakes", Nat Mater 2017;16:834-840 — doi.org
  9. Kaltenbrunner M et al. "An ultra-lightweight design for imperceptible plastic electronics", Nature 2013;499:458-463 — doi.org
  10. Gao W et al. "Fully integrated wearable sensor arrays for multiplexed in situ perspiration analysis", Nature 2016;529:509-514 — doi.org
  11. Parlak O et al. "Molecularly selective nanoporous membrane-based wearable organic electrochemical device for noninvasive cortisol sensing", Sci Adv 2018;4:eaar2904 — doi.org
  12. U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) De Novo DEN180044 (ECG App): classification order, 11 September 2018 (PDF) — www.accessdata.fda.gov
  13. FDA De Novo DEN180042 (Irregular Rhythm Notification Feature): classification order, 11 September 2018 (PDF) — www.accessdata.fda.gov
  14. FDA "Do Not Use Unauthorized Devices for Measuring Blood Pressure: FDA Safety Communication", 16 September 2025 — www.fda.gov
  15. U.S. Code of Federal Regulations 21 CFR 870.2345, Electrocardiograph software for over-the-counter use — www.ecfr.gov
  16. U.S. Code of Federal Regulations 21 CFR 870.2790, Photoplethysmograph analysis software for over-the-counter use — www.ecfr.gov
  17. U.S. Code of Federal Regulations 21 CFR 870.2700, Oximeter — www.ecfr.gov
  18. ISO ISO 80601-2-61:2026, Medical electrical equipment - Part 2-61: Particular requirements for basic safety and essential performance of pulse oximeter equipment (3rd edition) — www.iso.org
  19. IEC IEC 60601-2-47:2012, Medical electrical equipment - Part 2-47: Particular requirements for the basic safety and essential performance of ambulatory electrocardiographic systems — webstore.iec.ch
  20. ISO ISO 10993-1:2025, Biological evaluation of medical devices - Part 1 (6th edition) — www.iso.org
  21. ISO ISO 10993-10:2021, Biological evaluation of medical devices - Part 10: Tests for skin sensitization — www.iso.org
  22. ISO ISO 10993-23:2021, Biological evaluation of medical devices - Part 23: Tests for irritation — www.iso.org
  23. FDA 510(k) database: K242967 (Loss of Pulse Detection, Fitbit), 25 February 2025 — www.accessdata.fda.gov

13. Claim-to-source audit

Claim in the textBasisLabel
That PPG is a technique for detecting blood volume changes in the microvascular bed of tissue and that its waveform comprises a heartbeat-synchronous pulsatile (AC) component and a slowly varying baseline (DC)Abstract of the Physiol Meas 2007 review[Reference 1] https://doi.org/10.1088/0967-3334/28/3/R01Sourced
The noise sources of wearable PPG (individual: skin tone, obesity, age, gender; physiology: respiration, venous pulsation, body site, temperature; external: motion, ambient light, applied pressure; the device's hardware and software). A 535 nm single-LED wrist heart-rate monitor (256 subjects: 54 fair, 181 moderate, 21 dark) with greater error at darker skin tones; a 590 nm multi-wavelength PPG device (20 subjects, Fitzpatrick II to IV) with perfusion index up 1.2 to 7.1 times at Fitzpatrick IVAbstract and text of the Biosensors 2021 review (open-access version)[Reference 2] https://doi.org/10.3390/bios11040126Sourced
Occult hypoxemia (arterial saturation below 88% with pulse oximetry at 92 to 96%): 11.7% (88/749) of Black and 3.6% (99/2778) of White patients in the University of Michigan cohort, 17.0% (160/939) and 6.2% (546/8795) in the multicenter cohort; the authors' statement of nearly three times the frequencyText of the N Engl J Med 2020 letter (open-access version)[Reference 3] https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMc2029240Sourced
That Ag/AgCl electrodes give excellent signal quality but irritate in long-term use and need skin preparation; that dry electrodes have been studied for decades, are used in research, and had not achieved acceptance for medical use (as of 2013)Abstract of the Physiol Meas 2013 review[Reference 4] https://doi.org/10.1088/0967-3334/34/9/R47Sourced
That electronic systems matched in thickness, modulus, bending stiffness and areal mass density to the epidermis adhere by van der Waals interactions alone and were used to measure electrical activity of the heart, brain and skeletal musclesAbstract of the Science 2011 paper[Reference 5] https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1206157Sourced
A strategy combining microstructured inorganic and organic materials with elastomeric substrates for stretchable electronicsAbstract of the Science 2010 review[Reference 6] https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1182383Sourced
Embedding rigid functional elements in an ultralow-modulus soft system using soft microfluidics, structured adhesive surfaces and controlled mechanical bucklingAbstract of the Science 2014 paper[Reference 7] https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1250169Sourced
A printable elastic conductor in which silver nanoparticles form in situ from silver flakes, fluorine rubber and surfactant: above 4,000 S/cm at 0% strain (highest 6,168 S/cm) and 935 S/cm at 400% stretchAbstract of the Nat Mater 2017 paper[Reference 8] https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat4904Sourced
Circuits on 1-µm polymer foils with an areal mass of 3 g/m²Abstract of the Nature 2013 paper[Reference 9] https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12314Sourced
The substrate (moisture-resistant PET, 100 µm), insulation (parylene C, 500 nm) and skin-temperature compensation of the sweat sensor arrayText of the Nature 2016 paper (open-access version)[Reference 10] https://doi.org/10.1038/nature16521Sourced
The substrate (SEBS elastomer), polyethylene-based hydrophobic protection layer and microcapillary channels of the sweat cortisol sensorText of the Sci Adv 2018 paper (open-access version)[Reference 11] https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aar2904Sourced
ECG App: De Novo DEN180044, 11 September 2018; software for use with the Apple Watch; single-channel ECG similar to Lead I; determination of AFib or sinus rhythm; OTC; informational use; not for people under 22; 21 CFR 870.2345, Class IIFDA classification order and U.S. Code of Federal Regulations[Reference 12] https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/pdf18/DEN180044.pdf[Reference 15] https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-21/section-870.2345Sourced
Irregular Rhythm Notification Feature: De Novo DEN180042, 11 September 2018; identifies episodes of irregular rhythm suggestive of AFib from pulse rate data and notifies; not intended to notify on every episode; data captured only when still; not for people under 22 or previously diagnosed with AFib; 21 CFR 870.2790, Class IIFDA classification order and U.S. Code of Federal Regulations[Reference 13] https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/pdf18/DEN180042.pdf[Reference 16] https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-21/section-870.2790Sourced
That the FDA, in a safety communication of 16 September 2025, warned about unauthorized blood pressure devices, including software features on smartwatches and smart rings; that authorized devices generally have product code DXNFDA safety communication[Reference 14] https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/safety-communications/do-not-use-unauthorized-devices-measuring-blood-pressure-fda-safety-communicationSourced
The identification of an oximeter in 21 CFR 870.2700 and its Class II; that ISO 80601-2-61:2026 (third edition) covers pulse oximeter equipmentU.S. Code of Federal Regulations and the ISO official page[Reference 17] https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-21/section-870.2700[Reference 18] https://www.iso.org/standard/84595.htmlSourced
That IEC 60601-2-47:2012 (second edition) sets particular requirements for the basic safety and essential performance of ambulatory electrocardiographic systemsThe IEC Webstore official page[Reference 19] https://webstore.iec.ch/en/publication/2666Sourced
The titles and editions of ISO 10993-1:2025 (6th edition), ISO 10993-10:2021 (skin sensitization) and ISO 10993-23:2021 (irritation)The ISO official pages[Reference 20] https://www.iso.org/standard/10993-1[Reference 21] https://www.iso.org/standard/75279.html[Reference 22] https://www.iso.org/standard/74151.htmlSourced
Fitbit Loss of Pulse Detection: 510(k) K242967, 25 February 2025, product code SDY (the 21 CFR 870.2790 category)FDA 510(k) database record[Reference 23] https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm?ID=K242967Sourced
The voltage-divider fraction (with Zin = 10 MΩ assumed, 99.9%, 99.0%, 90.9% and 66.7% for Ze = 10 kΩ, 100 kΩ, 1 MΩ and 5 MΩ), the common-mode conversion ΔZ/Zin (100 kΩ/10 MΩ = 1%, about 10 mV for 1 V), and the comparison assuming an ECG amplitude of about 1 mVOur calculation. Zin, Ze, the size of the common-mode disturbance and the ECG amplitude are illustrative values assumed here, not values of real devices or people. Real amplifiers include circuits that suppress common-mode disturbanceOur calculation
Regulatory authorization of wearable sweat sensorsNot confirmed within the scope of this article (see the result in the explainer on biomarkers in body fluids in this series)Not yet confirmed
Systematic comparison of wearable-device performance across skin tones, quantification of long-term degradation of elastic conductors under repeated stretching, washing and sweat exposure, and the acceptance of dry electrodes since 2013Not confirmed in the primary sources consulted for this articleNot yet confirmed
The readings that the signal comes from the sensor-and-skin system, that wavelength, window material and detector layout are design variables behind skin-tone differences, that metal lines keep stretchability through shape and conductive fillers through particle arrangement, the right-hand column of the materials table, and the ties between each approach's factors and materials or geometryThis article's own organization and interpretation of published content; not views expressed by the authors of the papers or by the regulatorCommentary
That Figs. 1, 2, 4 and 6 are explanatory drawings, that Fig. 3 includes our calculation, and that the hero image and Fig. 5 are AI-generated imagesOur noteCommentary

Last updated 3 October 2026. Sources are limited to primary material (peer-reviewed papers, official FDA documents, the U.S. Code of Federal Regulations and the official pages of standards bodies). Interpretation of material design is marked Commentary and kept separate from sourced fact. Regulatory authorization of wearable sweat sensors, a systematic comparison of wearable-device performance across skin tones, quantification of long-term degradation of elastic conductors, and the acceptance of dry electrodes since 2013 are not stated, because no primary source could be confirmed. For standards (ISO and IEC) only titles and editions were confirmed, not the texts. The calculation in Section 5 uses illustrative values to explain structure. This article does not cover how to take measured values or notifications. All figures are explanatory concept graphics. Figs. 1, 2, 3, 4 and 6 are vector drawings; the hero image and Fig. 5 are AI-generated images, and none of them shows a real product, skin structure or measurement result.

🌐 Japanese