MENU

Arrowhead ARO-MAPT: Tau reduction data and BBB platform vs Biogen

BioSpace USA
Overview
Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals’ siRNA candidate ARO-MAPT achieved up to 85% reduction in CSF tau levels in healthy volunteers, according to Phase 1/2a data. Analysts suggest the platform’s ability to bypass the blood-brain barrier via subcutaneous injection may outperform competing technologies. This positions the company to compete with Biogen in the development of tau-targeting therapies.
In Depth

Key Findings

Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals has released early Phase 1/2a data for ARO-MAPT, an investigational gene silencer designed to lower tau protein levels. The study in healthy volunteers demonstrated significant reductions in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) tau, providing clinical validation for Arrowhead’s platform for targeting the central nervous system through subcutaneous administration.

Technical Details

The magnitude of tau reduction varied by dose and schedule at day 105:

  • Low dose (2.1-mg/kg): Administered on days 1, 8, and 15, resulting in an average CSF tau reduction of 40%.
  • Medium dose (6.4-mg/kg): Administered on days 1, 8, and 15, resulting in an average reduction of 69%.
  • High dose (12.8-mg/kg): Administered on days 1 and 15, resulting in a mean reduction of 73%, with a maximum reduction of 85% in this cohort.

Regarding safety, the treatment was generally well tolerated. Adverse events were largely mild, with no deaths, serious side effects, or dropouts due to toxicities.

Background & Context

Stifel analysts noted that these results appear more compelling than other blood-brain barrier (BBB) platforms, specifically comparing ARO-MAPT to Biogen’s BIIB080 (diranersen). While BIIB080 requires direct injection into the spine, ARO-MAPT is delivered subcutaneously. Biogen’s Phase 1b data for diranersen showed average CSF tau declines of 30% to 49% at eight weeks post-final dose, reaching up to 56% at 24 weeks. However, Jefferies cautioned that direct comparisons are limited due to differences in dose strengths and study populations.

Significance & Outlook

The Phase 1/2a trial is currently enrolling up to 112 participants, including healthy volunteers and patients with early Alzheimer’s disease. While Biogen’s Phase 2 CELIA study failed to meet its primary goal regarding cognitive and functional outcomes, Biogen intends to move diranersen into registrational development. Arrowhead expects further data on Alzheimer’s disease and healthy volunteers next year and is discussing studies for progressive supranuclear palsy and MAPT-associated frontotemporal dementia with regulators.

Source: https://www.biospace.com/drug-development/arrowheads-blood-brain-barrier-tech-is-arguably-better-than-others-analysts-say-after-data-drop

Get our weekly technology intelligence — free

Receive an infographic that lets you judge at a glance whether each field’s analysis report is worth reading.

Subscribe Free — Weekly Tech Intelligence

By subscribing, you’ll receive Troy-Technical’s weekly technology intelligence newsletter.

  • Your email and selected fields are used only to deliver the newsletter.
  • We never share your information with third parties.
  • You can unsubscribe anytime via the link in each email.

See our Privacy Policy for details.

Takes about a minute · Unsubscribe anytime

Published by Troy-Technical, an independent site run by one engineer with a career in materials development.
About the author / Contact info@troy-technical.jp
Let's share this post !

Author of this article

TOC